Pada aplikasi fluxion, penggunaannya sangat mudah, hanya saja ada beberapa alat yang saya rekomendasikan disini yang dapat kalian pakai agar proses hack wifi WPA2-PSK ini berjalan dengan lancar. Alat ini merupakan usb wireless yang cukup baik untuk memancarkan dan menerima sinyal wifi. Untuk harga pasarannya kisaran antara Rp. Kelebihan dari alat ini adalah dapat digunakan untuk menangkap sinyal wifi di luar rumah. Kalian dapat membelinya di toko komputer atau online shop seperti tokopedia, lazada, shopee atau toko online lainnya.
Saya akan memberikan tutorial dengan maksud sebagai pembelajaran saja, dan tentunya saya tidak akan bertanggung jawab jika teman-teman menyalahgunakan aplikasi yang akan saya berikan kepada teman-teman. Aplikasi yang tentunya harus sobat download disini jika sobat menggunakan windows 7, 8.
Vmware adalah software firtualisasi yang dapat menjalankan OS linux wifislax yang berbasis slackware dan berasal dari sepanyol yang khusus digunakan untuk mengaudit jaringan wifi. Dengan aplikasi ini kita dapat menjalankan OS wifislax tersebut pada windows yang kita gunakan saat ini. Untuk cara penginstalan dan aplikasi apa saja yang dibutuhkan untuk didownload, sobat dapat berkunjung ke link yang saya sediakan di akhir artikel ini.
Sesudah semua siap langsung saja ke caranya :. Setelah menginstal Vmware dan menjalankan file wifislax yang berbentuk file iso yang sudah. Klik icon bergambar "Ruji" pada bagian bawah, sudut paling kiri yang berwarna biru pada wifislax. Tekan angka 1 dan Enter pada keyboard untuk memilih pilihan crack wifi, wlan interface, all. Jika dirasa channel wifi target yang ingin sobat hack muncul, kita dapat menghentikannya dengan.
Saat ini target yang saya pakai adalah router yang saya miliki sendiri di urutan ke Sesuaikan dan ketik urutan target yang akan sobat hack wifinya. Setelah itu klik enter dan pilih pilihan 1 untuk memilih aircrack-ng, dan deauth channel all. Jangan close konsole2 tersebut sampai terlihat wpa handshake.
Jika sudah ditemukan handshake teman-teman dapat memilih pilihan "check handshake" pada. Jika muncul banyak konsole ingat jangan di close ya, biarkan aplikasi fluxion bekerja hingga. This was discovered by John A. Van Boxtel. As a result, all Android versions higher than 6. The new attack works by injecting a forged message 1, with the same ANonce as used in the original message 1, before forwarding the retransmitted message 3 to the victim.
Please cite our research paper and not this website or cite both. You can use the following example citation or bibtex entry:. Mathy Vanhoef and Frank Piessens. We have made scripts to detect whether an implementation of the 4-way handshake, group key handshake, or Fast BSS Transition FT handshake is vulnerable to key reinstallation attacks. These scripts are available on github , and contain detailed instructions on how to use them.
We also made a proof-of-concept script that exploits the all-zero key re installation present in certain Android and Linux devices. This script is the one that we used in the demonstration video. It will be released once everyone has had a reasonable chance to update their devices and we have had a chance to prepare the code repository for release.
We remark that the reliability of our proof-of-concept script may depend on how close the victim is to the real network. If the victim is very close to the real network, the script may fail because the victim will always directly communicate with the real network, even if the victim is forced onto a different Wi-Fi channel than this network.
Yes there is. And a big thank you goes to Darlee Urbiztondo for conceptualizing and designing the logo! No, luckily implementations can be patched in a backwards-compatible manner. This means a patched client can still communicate with an unpatched access point AP , and vice versa.
In other words, a patched client or access point sends exactly the same handshake messages as before, and at exactly the same moment in time. However, the security updates will assure a key is only installed once, preventing our attack. So again, update all your devices once security updates are available. Finally, although an unpatched client can still connect to a patched AP, and vice versa, both the client and AP must be patched to defend against all attacks!
Changing the password of your Wi-Fi network does not prevent or mitigate the attack. So you do not have to update the password of your Wi-Fi network. Instead, you should make sure all your devices are updated, and you should also update the firmware of your router. Nevertheless, after updating both your client devices and your router, it's never a bad idea to change the Wi-Fi password.
Yes, that network configuration is also vulnerable. So everyone should update their devices to prevent the attack! I use the word "we" because that's what I'm used to writing in papers. In practice, all the work is done by me, with me being Mathy Vanhoef. My awesome supervisor is added under an honorary authorship to the research paper for his excellent general guidance.
But all the real work was done on my own. So the author list of academic papers does not represent division of work :. Any device that uses Wi-Fi is likely vulnerable. Contact your vendor for more information, or consult this community maintained list on GitHub.
First, the FT handshake is part of Additionally, most home routers or APs do not support or will not use client functionality. In other words, your home router or AP likely does not require security updates. Instead, it are mainly enterprise networks that will have to update their network infrastructure i.
That said, some vendors discovered implementation-specific security issues while investigating our attack. For example, it was discovered that hostapd reuses the ANonce value in the 4-way handshake during rekeys. Concretely this means that, even if your router or AP does not support Contact your vendor for more details. Finally, we remark that you can try to mitigate attacks against routers and APs by disabling client functionality which is for example used in repeater modes and disabling Additionally, update all your other client devices such as laptops and smartphones.
If one or more of your client devices is not receiving updates, you can also try to contact your router's vendor and ask if they have an update that prevents attacks against connected devices. Currently, all vulnerable devices should be patched. In other words, patching the AP will not prevent attacks against vulnerable clients.
Similarly, patching all clients will not prevent attacks against vulnerable access points. That said, it is possible to modify the access point such that vulnerable clients when connected to this AP cannot be attacked. However, these modifications are different from the normal security patches that are being released for vulnerable access points! So unless your access point vendor explicitly mentions that their patches prevent attacks against clients, you must also patch clients.
It's possible to modify the access point router such that connected clients are not vulnerable to attacks against the 4-way handshake and group key handshake. Note that we consider these two attacks the most serious and widespread security issues we discovered. However, these modifications only prevent attacks when a vulnerable client is connected to such a modified access point. When a vulnerable client connects to a different access point, it can still be attacked.
Technically, this is accomplished by modifying the access point such that it does not retransmit message 3 of the 4-way handshake. Additionally, the access point is modified to not retransmit message 1 of the group key handshake. The hostapd project has such a modification available. They are currently evaluating to which extend this impacts the reliability of these handshakes. We remark that the client-side attacks against the 4-way handshake and group key handshake can also be prevented by retransmitting the above handshake messages using the same previous EAPOL-Key replay counter.
The attack against the group key handshake can also be prevented by letting the access point install the group key in a delayed fashion, and by assuring the access point only accepts the latest replay counter see section 4. On some products, variants or generalizations of the above mitigations can be enabled without having to update products. For example, on some access points retransmissions of all handshake messages can be disabled, preventing client-side attacks against the 4-way and group key handshake see for example Cisco.
When working on the final i. In a sense I was slacking off, because I was supposed to be just finishing the paper, instead of staring at code. But there I was, inspecting some code I already read a hundred times, to avoid having to work on the next paragraph.
This function is called when processing message 3 of the 4-way handshake, and it installs the pairwise key to the driver.
At the time I correctly guessed that calling it twice might reset the nonces associated to the key. And since message 3 can be retransmitted by the Access Point, in practice it might indeed be called twice. Other vendors might also call such a function twice. But let's first finish this paper A few weeks later, after finishing the paper and completing some other work, I investigated this new idea in more detail.
And the rest is history. The brief answer is that the formal proof does not assure a key is installed only once. Instead, it merely assures the negotiated key remains secret, and that handshake messages cannot be forged. The longer answer is mentioned in the introduction of our research paper : our attacks do not violate the security properties proven in formal analysis of the 4-way handshake. In particular, these proofs state that the negotiated encryption key remains private, and that the identity of both the client and Access Point AP is confirmed.
Our attacks do not leak the encryption key. Additionally, although normal data frames can be forged if TKIP or GCMP is used, an attacker cannot forge handshake messages and hence cannot impersonate the client or AP during handshakes. Therefore, the properties that were proven in formal analysis of the 4-way handshake remain true.
However, the problem is that the proofs do not model key installation. Put differently, the formal models did not define when a negotiated key should be installed.
In practice, this means the same key can be installed multiple times, thereby resetting nonces and replay counters used by the encryption protocol e. We have follow-up work making our attacks against macOS and OpenBSD for example significantly more general and easier to execute. So although we agree that some of the attack scenarios in the paper are rather impractical, do not let this fool you into believing key reinstallation attacks cannot be abused in practice.
As mentioned in the demonstration, the attacker first obtains a man-in-the-middle MitM position between the victim and the real Wi-Fi network called a channel-based MitM position.
However, this MitM position does not enable the attacker to decrypt packets! This position only allows the attacker to reliably delay, block, or replay encrypted packets. So at this point in the attack, they cannot yet decrypt packets. Instead, the ability to reliably delay and block packets is used to execute a key reinstallation attack.
After performing a key reinstallation attack, packets can be decrypted. An adversary has to be within range of both the client being attacked meaning the smartphone or laptop and the network itself. This means an adversary on the other side of the world cannot attack you remotely. However, the attacker can still be relatively far way.
That's because special antenna can be used to carry out the attack from two miles to up to eight miles in ideal conditions. Additionally, the attacker is not competing with the signal strength of the real Wi-Fi network, but instead uses so-called Channel Switch Announcements to manipulate and attack the client. As a result, it is possible to successfully carry out attacks even when far away from the victim. We are not in a position to determine if this vulnerability has been or is being actively exploited in the wild.
That said, key reinstallations can actually occur spontaneously without an adversary being present! This may for example happen if the last message of a handshake is lost due to background noise, causing a retransmission of the previous message. When processing this retransmitted message, keys may be reinstalled, resulting in nonce reuse just like in a real attack.
There seems to be an agreement that the Wi-Fi standard should be updated to explicitly prevent our attacks. These updates likely will be backwards-compatible with older implementations of WPA2. Time will tell whether and how the standard will be updated.
0コメント